
Understanding risk
Understanding risk
Choosing the appropriate level of risk
While there is a positive correlation between risk and return, a desired level of returns cannot be guaranteed. Risk exposure should therefore be viewed in the context of an investor's wider financial circumstances, investment knowledge and experience and will depend on a range of factors, including their investment timeline and how much risk they can tolerate.
Taking on higher levels of risk to earn higher returns can potentially lead investors to lose wealth that they can't afford. A broad rule-of-thumb suggests investors should invest no more than 10% of their net assets (i.e. total investments excluding one's primary home) in high risk investments which could be lost. Conversely, too little risk and an investor's goals may not be achieved.
While all investors have their own specific resources and goals, one way of determining a risk-reward framework is to use an investment risk pyramid. Divided into three segments, the bulk of assets would be at the base layer and allocated to lower risk investments. As the pyramid narrows, so investment selection shrinks and becomes riskier.
Summit (high risk)
At the top of the investment pyramid, holdings here represent the high risk/high reward options. While offering the possibility of outsized returns, their elevated risk profile - possibly made up of derivates, commodities and cryptocurrencies - means that investors should be able to accept losses here with few repercussions to their longer term goals.
Middle (medium risk)
Including high-quality stocks, unit trusts, real estate and index trackers, this blend of slightly more risky assets offers the possibility of higher returns, while providing protection against weakness for a particular stock or asset.
Base (low risk)
Examples of financial assets in this category might include savings accounts and government bonds. These risk-averse instruments provide capital preservation and an income stream.